From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 791F87F37 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 02:03:22 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8AA3AC003 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 00:03:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id tr7WiUtwzI3eX4Vb (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 00:03:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 09:03:12 +0200 From: Carlos Maiolino Subject: Re: What's up with this list? Message-ID: <20150921070312.GA2617@redhat.com> References: <541AFB60.5030403@sgi.com> <55FAF053.3020405@sgi.com> <55FB06E8.1020203@opensuse.org> <55FC3569.5020801@sgi.com> <20150918225624.GF26895@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150918225624.GF26895@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Troy McCorkell , carlos.e.r@opensuse.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 08:56:24AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:01:45AM -0500, Troy McCorkell wrote: > > xfs@oss.sgi.com is an open list and does not require people to be members > > of the list to post to it. The spam filters applied to > > xfs@oss.sgi.com are > > as aggressive as they can be and still allow for an open list. > > > > Next option would be to add a moderator to the list. Adding a moderator > > would interfere with non-list members posting to the list. > > Moderation is not an option because of this interference and the > burden it puts on the moderator to respond in a timely fashion. > > If the spam rejection does not improve our next option is to move to > the linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org list - the vger infrastructure is not > perfect, but it does have better spam rejection than the current > filtering on this list. This may be the best long-term solution to > the problem, but it does involve short term pain for everyone. > +1 for that, the pain is not that much, and we've discussed moving xfs list to vger.kernel.org for a while, I really don't see a reason to do so, other than people needing to update their e-mail addresses and maybe git configurations. To relief even more the pain, xfs@sgi, could just forward the e-mails to linux-xfs with a InReplyTo modified to linux-xfs even. Althouh, I'm not sure how feasible is the last part. > Cheers, > > Dave. > -- > Dave Chinner > david@fromorbit.com > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@oss.sgi.com > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs -- Carlos _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs