From: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs_io: Implement inodes64 command
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 09:54:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150922075432.GC26699@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150921220832.GB19114@dastard>
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 08:08:32AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:56:08AM +0200, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> > Implement an easy way to check a filesystem for the existence of 64bit inodes.
> >
> > Based on XFS_IOC_FSINUMBERS, and starting with a lastip of XFS_MAXINUMBER_32, it
> > returns a string saying if there is or there isn't 64bit inodes in the
> > filesystem.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > io/open.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/io/open.c b/io/open.c
> > index ac5a5e0..b25b09d 100644
> > --- a/io/open.c
> > +++ b/io/open.c
> > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> > #include "input.h"
> > #include "init.h"
> > #include "io.h"
> > +#include "libxfs.h"
> >
> > #ifndef __O_TMPFILE
> > #if defined __alpha__
> > @@ -44,6 +45,7 @@ static cmdinfo_t statfs_cmd;
> > static cmdinfo_t chproj_cmd;
> > static cmdinfo_t lsproj_cmd;
> > static cmdinfo_t extsize_cmd;
> > +static cmdinfo_t inodes64_cmd;
> > static prid_t prid;
> > static long extsize;
> >
> > @@ -750,6 +752,36 @@ statfs_f(
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static int
> > +inodes64_f(
> > + int argc,
> > + char **argv)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > + __s32 count;
> > + __u64 last = XFS_MAXINUMBER_32;
> > + xfs_inogrp_t igroup;
> > + xfs_fsop_bulkreq_t bulkreq;
>
> Please don't use typedefs.
>
Ok.
> > +
> > + bulkreq.lastip = &last;
> > + bulkreq.icount = 1;
> > + bulkreq.ubuffer = &igroup;
> > + bulkreq.ocount = &count;
> > +
> > + if (!xfsctl(file->name, file->fd, XFS_IOC_FSINUMBERS, &bulkreq)) {
> > + if (count > 0) {
> > + printf("Filesystem does have 64bit inodes\n");
> > + return 0;
> > + } else {
> > + printf("Filesystem does not have 64bit inodes\n");
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + perror("xfsctl(XFS_IOC_FSINUMBERS)");
>
> I'd do this the other way around:
>
> if (xfsctl(file->name, file->fd, XFS_IOC_FSINUMBERS, &bulkreq)) {
> perror("XFS_IOC_FSINUMBERS");
> exitcode = 1;
> return 0;
> }
>
> if (count > 0)
> printf("Filesystem does have 64bit inodes\n");
> else
> printf("Filesystem does not have 64bit inodes\n");
> return 0;
>
> is sufficient, xfsctl is a one line wrapper around ioctl().
>
Ok, I'll change this, but, just a matter of curiosity, what are the technical
reasons to write the conditional this way, instead of the way I wrote first?
Just to avoid entering the conditional?
> > @@ -815,6 +847,12 @@ open_init(void)
> > _("get/set preferred extent size (in bytes) for the open file");
> > extsize_cmd.help = extsize_help;
> >
> > + inodes64_cmd.name = "inodes64";
> > + inodes64_cmd.cfunc = inodes64_f;
> > + inodes64_cmd.flags = CMD_NOMAP_OK;
> > + inodes64_cmd.oneline =
> > + _("Checks if filesyste contais 64bit inodes");
> ^^^ ^^ 64 bit
>
> "inodes64" could be improved as a command name. e.g:
>
> oneline = _("Query inode number usage in the filesystem")
>
> And could do a little more to help users work out what the
> problematic inode is. e.g:
>
> Long help:
>
> Inode_numbers [-s|-l] [num]
>
> [-s] returns the physical size of the largest inode
> number in the filesystem (32 bit of 64 bit)
> [-l] returns the largest inode number in the filesystem
> [-n] returns the next inode number after [num]
> [num] returns whether the inode number exists
>
> i.e. if you want 32 bit inodes in the fs, you can use [-n num] to
> iterate all the inode numbers above 32 bits in size...
>
Ok, np
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
--
Carlos
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-22 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-21 8:56 [PATCH] xfs_io: Implement inodes64 command Carlos Maiolino
2015-09-21 20:50 ` Eric Sandeen
2015-09-22 7:44 ` Carlos Maiolino
2015-09-21 22:08 ` Dave Chinner
2015-09-22 7:54 ` Carlos Maiolino [this message]
2015-09-22 12:22 ` Brian Foster
2015-09-22 22:00 ` Dave Chinner
2015-09-23 10:28 ` [PATCH] xfs_io: Implement inodes64 command - bug in XFS_IOC_FSINUMBERS? Carlos Maiolino
2015-09-23 12:24 ` Brian Foster
2015-09-23 23:10 ` Dave Chinner
2015-09-24 8:47 ` Carlos Maiolino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150922075432.GC26699@redhat.com \
--to=cmaiolino@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox