From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Angelo Dureghello <angelo.dureghello@nomovok.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: xfstests, xfs test 080 fails on arm 32bit
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 15:04:26 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150930050425.GC3902@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <560A9307.6080600@nomovok.com>
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 03:32:55PM +0200, Angelo Dureghello wrote:
> Hi,
>
> executing this test on a 32bit arm. i get (i traced mmapping sizes):
>
> # ./start_xfs_test.sh
> QA output created by 080
> [ 161.827446] XFS (mmcblk0p5): Mounting V4 Filesystem
> [ 162.357952] XFS (mmcblk0p5): Ending clean mount
>
> mmapping 512000000
> mmapping 512000000
> mmapping 512000000
> mmapping 512000000
> mmapping 512000000
> mmapping 512000000
>
> oio ( 3241) 15:18:17
> ---------------------
> mmap() failed - 0xffffffff 12
>
> doio ( 3241) 15:18:17
> ---------------------
> mmap-read() request failed: Cannot allocate memory (12)
> Request number 15
> fd 4 is file /media/p5/rwtest.file - open flags are 0 O_RDONLY,
> read done at file offset 978498
> number of requests is 1, strides per request is 1
> i/o byte count = 119505
> memory alignment is unaligned
>
> syscall: mmap-read(NULL, 512000000, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, 4, 0)
> file is mmaped to: 0x0
> file-mem=0xeee42, length=119505, buffer=0x484a6
Does it close/unmap the other files it mmaps? i.e. 32 bit only has a
3GB address space for user applications (IIRC), so the 6th 512MB
mapping will run the process out of address space and hence fail....
> doio ( 3241) 15:18:17
> ---------------------
> doio(): operation 120 returned != 0
> rwtest.sh : iogen reported errors (r=141)
>
>
> Is it possible the test was thought to pass on 64bit systems ?
Works just fine on 64 bit systems:
$ sudo ./check xfs/080
FSTYP -- xfs (debug)
PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 test2 4.3.0-rc1-dgc+
MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/sdg
MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o context=system_u:object_r:nfs_t:s0 /dev/sdg
/mnt/scratch
xfs/080 2s ... 7s
Ran: xfs/080
Passed all 1 tests
And looking at the memory footprint:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
3300 root 20 0 3010672 1612 1344 D 4.7 0.0 0:00.14 doio
Yup, 3GB of virtual address space used, 1.6MB of actual memory used.
_require_64bit_userspace is probably needed here...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-30 5:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-29 13:32 xfstests, xfs test 080 fails on arm 32bit Angelo Dureghello
2015-09-30 5:04 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150930050425.GC3902@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=angelo.dureghello@nomovok.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox