public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: clarify lock ordering comment
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 17:02:42 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151008230242.GA14219@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151008222450.GH32150@dastard>

On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 09:24:50AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 03:58:01PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > Replace "i_mmap_lock" with "mmap_lock" in the lock ordering comment above
> > xfs_filemap_page_mkwrite().  The lock in question is actually the
> > XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED rw_semaphore (no leading "i"), and this comment is
> 
> struct xfs_inode {
> ....
> 	        mrlock_t                i_mmaplock;     /* inode mmap IO lock */
> ....
> 
> > easily confused with the "i_mmap_lock_[read|write]" functions that operate
> > on struct address_space->i_mmap_rwsem.  This clarification is especially
> > important because address_space->i_mmap_rwsem is taken down in the DAX
> > code as part of this fault path.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> > index f429662..b190033 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> > @@ -1477,7 +1477,7 @@ xfs_file_llseek(
> >   *
> >   * mmap_sem (MM)
> >   *   sb_start_pagefault(vfs, freeze)
> > - *     i_mmap_lock (XFS - truncate serialisation)
> > + *     mmap_lock (XFS - truncate serialisation)
> 
> As per above, the XFS lock is "i_mmaplock"...
> 
> The lock names are annotated with the subsystem the lock belongs to
> to avoid this confusion. Along with the lock ordering (inside
> sb_start_pagefault) this should indicate that it's not the
> "i_mmap_lock (MM - vma serialisation)" lock... ;)

Ah, that makes sense, thanks. :)

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

      reply	other threads:[~2015-10-08 23:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-08 21:58 [PATCH] xfs: clarify lock ordering comment Ross Zwisler
2015-10-08 22:24 ` Dave Chinner
2015-10-08 23:02   ` Ross Zwisler [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151008230242.GA14219@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox