From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6777B7F37 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 12:08:24 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55ED7304062 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:08:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id enN5YUPa3rNa8lMD (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:08:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:08:18 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/51] xfs_db: enable blockget for v5 filesystems Message-ID: <20151014170818.GA10559@infradead.org> References: <20151007050513.1504.28089.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <20151007050558.1504.97525.stgit@birch.djwong.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151007050558.1504.97525.stgit@birch.djwong.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 10:05:58PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > Plumb in the necessary finobt scanning, magic number checks, and other > fixups required to handle v5 filesystems. This makes it so that check > can spot-check v5 filesystems even though xfs_repair is now the > preferred fixer tool, which makes the xfstests fs check function a > little happier. As is this makes xfstests rather unhappy by failing tests. I'm not sure if that's issues in the blockget / xfs_check functionality or because it actually finds bugs in the kernel code. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs