From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com, jack@suse.cz, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6 V2] xfs: upfront block zeroing for DAX
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 16:48:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151105234827.GA5771@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1445225238-30413-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 02:27:12PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> This is an updated patch set that was first posted here:
>
> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2015-10/msg00006.html
>
> I've dropped the DAX locking revert patch from it; that's on it's
> way to Linus via other channels and is essentially independent to
> this set of XFS changes.
>
> The only real change in the XFS code between the two versions is the
> addition of XFS_TRANS_RESERVE in the DAX path in
> xfs_iomap_write_direct() to allow it to dip into the reserve block
> pool for unwritten extent conversion rather than reporting ENOSPC.
>
> Patches are against 4.3-rc5 + XFS for-next branch.
>
> -Dave.
Hey Dave,
I was going to start testing these, but I'm having trouble finding a baseline
where they apply cleanly. It looks like xfs/for-next already contains v1 of
the series, and they don't seem to apply cleanly to the current
xfs/xfs-misc-fixes-for-4.4-2 nor to v4.3. The xfs repo I'm looking at is
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dgc/linux-xfs.git
What am I missing?
Thanks,
- Ross
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-05 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-19 3:27 [PATCH 0/6 V2] xfs: upfront block zeroing for DAX Dave Chinner
2015-10-19 3:27 ` [PATCH 1/6] xfs: fix inode size update overflow in xfs_map_direct() Dave Chinner
2015-10-29 14:27 ` Brian Foster
2015-10-19 3:27 ` [PATCH 2/6] xfs: introduce BMAPI_ZERO for allocating zeroed extents Dave Chinner
2015-10-29 14:27 ` Brian Foster
2015-10-29 23:35 ` Dave Chinner
2015-10-30 12:36 ` Brian Foster
2015-11-02 1:21 ` Dave Chinner
2015-10-19 3:27 ` [PATCH 3/6] xfs: Don't use unwritten extents for DAX Dave Chinner
2015-10-29 14:29 ` Brian Foster
2015-10-29 23:37 ` Dave Chinner
2015-10-30 12:36 ` Brian Foster
2015-11-02 1:14 ` Dave Chinner
2015-11-02 14:15 ` Brian Foster
2015-11-02 21:44 ` Dave Chinner
2015-11-03 3:53 ` Dan Williams
2015-11-03 5:04 ` Dave Chinner
2015-11-04 0:50 ` Ross Zwisler
2015-11-04 1:02 ` Dan Williams
2015-11-04 4:46 ` Ross Zwisler
2015-11-04 9:06 ` Jan Kara
2015-11-04 15:35 ` Ross Zwisler
2015-11-04 17:21 ` Jan Kara
2015-11-03 9:16 ` Jan Kara
2015-10-19 3:27 ` [PATCH 4/6] xfs: DAX does not use IO completion callbacks Dave Chinner
2015-10-29 14:29 ` Brian Foster
2015-10-29 23:39 ` Dave Chinner
2015-10-30 12:37 ` Brian Foster
2015-10-19 3:27 ` [PATCH 5/6] xfs: add ->pfn_mkwrite support for DAX Dave Chinner
2015-10-29 14:30 ` Brian Foster
2015-10-19 3:27 ` [PATCH 6/6] xfs: xfs_filemap_pmd_fault treats read faults as write faults Dave Chinner
2015-10-29 14:30 ` Brian Foster
2015-11-05 23:48 ` Ross Zwisler [this message]
2015-11-06 22:32 ` [PATCH 0/6 V2] xfs: upfront block zeroing for DAX Dave Chinner
2015-11-06 18:12 ` Boylston, Brian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151105234827.GA5771@linux.intel.com \
--to=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox