From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A7747F58 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 16:32:46 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E5E304039 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 14:32:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.129]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id srRk4THSzkHowi81 for ; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 14:32:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2015 09:32:38 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6 V2] xfs: upfront block zeroing for DAX Message-ID: <20151106223238.GT10656@dastard> References: <1445225238-30413-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20151105234827.GA5771@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151105234827.GA5771@linux.intel.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Ross Zwisler Cc: jack@suse.cz, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 04:48:27PM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 02:27:12PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > This is an updated patch set that was first posted here: > > > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2015-10/msg00006.html > > > > I've dropped the DAX locking revert patch from it; that's on it's > > way to Linus via other channels and is essentially independent to > > this set of XFS changes. > > > > The only real change in the XFS code between the two versions is the > > addition of XFS_TRANS_RESERVE in the DAX path in > > xfs_iomap_write_direct() to allow it to dip into the reserve block > > pool for unwritten extent conversion rather than reporting ENOSPC. > > > > Patches are against 4.3-rc5 + XFS for-next branch. > > > > -Dave. > > Hey Dave, > > I was going to start testing these, but I'm having trouble finding a baseline > where they apply cleanly. It looks like xfs/for-next already contains v1 of > the series, and they don't seem to apply cleanly to the current > xfs/xfs-misc-fixes-for-4.4-2 nor to v4.3. The xfs repo I'm looking at is > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dgc/linux-xfs.git The xfs-dax-updates branch of that kernel contains the v3 version of the patches I posted a few days ago. i.e. just pull the for-next branch of the XFS tree, because that already contains all the patches integrated into the rest of the XFS for-next tree... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs