From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA297F37 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 01:54:42 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EFB6AC004 for ; Sun, 8 Nov 2015 23:54:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id AvqCXFfFklREoZtP (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 23:54:39 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 23:54:38 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/51] xfs_io: support reflink and dedupe of file ranges Message-ID: <20151109075438.GA17974@infradead.org> References: <20151007050513.1504.28089.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <20151007050533.1504.66249.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <20151014053656.GJ10397@birch.djwong.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151014053656.GJ10397@birch.djwong.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Any reason why the dedup command is called 'dedupe'? Is this a revenge for the missing 'e' in the creat syscall? :) Either way it would be good to get this support in ASAP so we can have the command ready for xfstests and we can merge the test. They are useful for btrfs and NFS already, so I'd love to fast track them. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs