From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C3C7F62 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 06:51:28 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2873C304039 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 04:51:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id CDnPn14F8A2SALEp (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 04:51:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 04:51:15 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [RFCv3.1 00/11] xfstests: test the nfs/cifs/btrfs/xfs reflink/dedupe ioctls Message-ID: <20151112125115.GA28822@infradead.org> References: <20151111192628.15056.6451.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <20151112090756.GA25685@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151112090756.GA25685@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, tao.peng@primarydata.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 01:07:56AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Looks fine: > > Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig Actually I take this back. I had though this was the existing series with my fixes, but this one still incorrectly assumes that if reflink works dedup works as well, leading to lots of false failures on nfs. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs