Re: Which xfsprogs version to which kernel version

[Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 02:18:51PM +0100, aluno3@poczta.onet.pl wrote:
> Yes I used -f option with 4.X version of xfsprogs but mounting the
> volume was not possible - before mkfs.xfs finished successfully
> (mkfs.xfs -f -m crc=0,finobt=0).
> 

You posted the output associated with the crc=1 fs mount failure, what
happens when you try to mount after formatting with crc=0?

Brian

> Should I stay in 3.1.X family of xfsprogs or is it recommended to use at
> least 3.2.x version with kernel 3.10?
> 
> The most I care about xfs_repair.
> 
> On 11/26/15 13:26, Emmanuel Florac wrote:
> > Le Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:21:45 +0100
> > "aluno3@poczta.onet.pl" <aluno3@poczta.onet.pl> écrivait:
> > 
> >> mkfs.xfs -m crc=0,finobt=0
> >>
> >> but it does not work with 4.X version of xfsprogs. Call trace also
> >> occurred so I tried to use 3.2.4 family with crc=0,finobt=0 and volume
> >> mounted successfully.
> >>
> > 
> > Did you use -f? else mkfs.xfs won't do anything as it'll detect an
> > existing filesystem.
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs