From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E477F37 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 07:50:56 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3EF4304051 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 05:50:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id b6FpzTuJnoLEnq5S (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 05:50:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:50:53 -0500 From: Brian Foster Subject: Re: Which xfsprogs version to which kernel version Message-ID: <20151126135053.GB39911@bfoster.bfoster> References: <5656DD39.8060403@poczta.onet.pl> <20151126132638.53ed9fc7@harpe.intellique.com> <565706BB.3030006@poczta.onet.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <565706BB.3030006@poczta.onet.pl> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: "aluno3@poczta.onet.pl" Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 02:18:51PM +0100, aluno3@poczta.onet.pl wrote: > Yes I used -f option with 4.X version of xfsprogs but mounting the > volume was not possible - before mkfs.xfs finished successfully > (mkfs.xfs -f -m crc=3D0,finobt=3D0). > = You posted the output associated with the crc=3D1 fs mount failure, what happens when you try to mount after formatting with crc=3D0? Brian > Should I stay in 3.1.X family of xfsprogs or is it recommended to use at > least 3.2.x version with kernel 3.10? > = > The most I care about xfs_repair. > = > On 11/26/15 13:26, Emmanuel Florac wrote: > > Le Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:21:45 +0100 > > "aluno3@poczta.onet.pl" =E9crivait: > > = > >> mkfs.xfs -m crc=3D0,finobt=3D0 > >> > >> but it does not work with 4.X version of xfsprogs. Call trace also > >> occurred so I tried to use 3.2.4 family with crc=3D0,finobt=3D0 and vo= lume > >> mounted successfully. > >> > > = > > Did you use -f? else mkfs.xfs won't do anything as it'll detect an > > existing filesystem. > > = > = > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@oss.sgi.com > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs