Re: Which xfsprogs version to which kernel version

aluno3
2015-11-26T14:37:18Z

dmesg when mounting volume which was formated xfsprogs 4.3.0:

*
root@192.168.176.24:~$ mkfs.xfs -V
mkfs.xfs version 4.3.0

root@192.168.176.24:~$ mkfs.xfs -f -m crc=0,finobt=0 /dev/sdc4
meta-data=/dev/sdc4 isize=256 agcount=4, agsize=474552 blks
= sectsz=512 attr=2, projid32bit=1
= crc=0 finobt=0, sparse=0
data = bsize=4096 blocks=1898208, imaxpct=25
= sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0 ftype=1
log =internal log bsize=4096 blocks=2560, version=2
= sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0

root@192.168.176.24:~$ mount /dev/sdc4 /mnt/sdc4
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdc4,
missing codepage or helper program, or other error

In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
dmesg | tail or so.

root@192.168.176.24:~$ dmesg
[ 212.984534] XFS (sdc4): bad version
[ 212.984547] ffff88005cccb000: 58 46 53 42 00 00 10 00 00 00 00 00 00
1c f6 e0 XFSB............
[ 212.984550] ffff88005cccb010: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00 00 00 ................
[ 212.984551] ffff88005cccb020: 55 9d 20 d9 1c e9 4e a9 a3 ee 8d fd ba
68 b3 70 U. ...N......h.p
[ 212.984553] ffff88005cccb030: 00 00 00 00 00 10 00 04 00 00 00 00 00
00 00 80 ................
[ 212.984556] XFS (sdc4): Internal error xfs_sb_read_verify at line 730
of file fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c. Caller 0xffffffff81256c7d

[ 212.984560] CPU: 0 PID: 440 Comm: kworker/0:1H Tainted: P O
3.10.92-oe64-ge331686 #15
[ 212.984562] Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product
Name/P5WDG2 WS Pro, BIOS 0905 03/06/2008
[ 212.984567] Workqueue: xfslogd xfs_buf_iodone_work
[ 212.984570] ffffffff81692f75 ffffffff81258c5d ffffffff81256c7d
ffffffff818a39e3
[ 212.984573] ffff88007aa9ef00 0000000000000016 ffff88007aa8b000
0000000000000000
[ 212.984576] ffff88007ea17800 ffffffff812a32ac ffffffff81256c7d
ffff88007ea11a40
[ 212.984579] Call Trace:
[ 212.984584] [<ffffffff81692f75>] ? dump_stack+0xc/0x15
[ 212.984587] [<ffffffff81258c5d>] ? xfs_corruption_error+0x8d/0x90
[ 212.984590] [<ffffffff81256c7d>] ? xfs_buf_iodone_work+0x6d/0x90
[ 212.984595] [<ffffffff812a32ac>] ? xfs_sb_read_verify+0xfc/0x120
[ 212.984598] [<ffffffff81256c7d>] ? xfs_buf_iodone_work+0x6d/0x90
[ 212.984600] [<ffffffff81256c7d>] ? xfs_buf_iodone_work+0x6d/0x90
[ 212.984604] [<ffffffff8105ce4d>] ? process_one_work+0x13d/0x3b0
[ 212.984607] [<ffffffff8105d7b1>] ? worker_thread+0x121/0x3d0
[ 212.984609] [<ffffffff8105d690>] ? manage_workers.isra.26+0x280/0x280
[ 212.984613] [<ffffffff81062e92>] ? kthread+0xc2/0xd0
[ 212.984616] [<ffffffff81070000>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x30/0x100
[ 212.984619] [<ffffffff81062dd0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x110/0x110
[ 212.984623] [<ffffffff8169db98>] ? ret_from_fork+0x58/0x90
[ 212.984626] [<ffffffff81062dd0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x110/0x110
[ 212.984628] XFS (sdc4): Corruption detected. Unmount and run xfs_repair
[ 212.984634] XFS (sdc4): SB validate failed with error 22.
*

On 11/26/15 14:50, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 02:18:51PM +0100, aluno3@poczta.onet.pl wrote:
>> Yes I used -f option with 4.X version of xfsprogs but mounting the
>> volume was not possible - before mkfs.xfs finished successfully
>> (mkfs.xfs -f -m crc=0,finobt=0).
>>
>
> You posted the output associated with the crc=1 fs mount failure, what
> happens when you try to mount after formatting with crc=0?
>
> Brian
>
>> Should I stay in 3.1.X family of xfsprogs or is it recommended to use at
>> least 3.2.x version with kernel 3.10?
>>
>> The most I care about xfs_repair.
>>
>> On 11/26/15 13:26, Emmanuel Florac wrote:
>>> Le Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:21:45 +0100
>>> "aluno3@poczta.onet.pl" <aluno3@poczta.onet.pl> écrivait:
>>>
>>>> mkfs.xfs -m crc=0,finobt=0
>>>>
>>>> but it does not work with 4.X version of xfsprogs. Call trace also
>>>> occurred so I tried to use 3.2.4 family with crc=0,finobt=0 and volume
>>>> mounted successfully.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Did you use -f? else mkfs.xfs won't do anything as it'll detect an
>>> existing filesystem.
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> xfs mailing list
>> xfs@oss.sgi.com
>> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs