From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B6BA7F37 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 10:44:23 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F380AAC002 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 08:44:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id hyqOxImjO4CDvcQI for ; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 08:44:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 09:43:42 -0700 From: Ross Zwisler Subject: Re: xfstest failure with xfs, dax and v4.4-rc3 Message-ID: <20151203164342.GA14849@linux.intel.com> References: <20151201224346.GA15684@linux.intel.com> <20151201235158.GF19199@dastard> <20151203065127.GB26718@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151203065127.GB26718@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Brian Foster , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, Jeff Moyer , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Ross Zwisler On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 05:51:27PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > As it is, that test does not fail on my DAX testing on RAM disks. > ISTR it failing up until recently, though. Yeah: > > Last login: Tue Nov 17 08:45:55 2015 from 192.168.1.103 > $ cd ~/src/xfstests-dev; sudo mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 ; sudo xfs_admin -U generate /dev/ram0 ; sudo MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o dax" ./check -g auto > SECTION -- xfs > FSTYP -- xfs (debug) > PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 test4 4.3.0-dgc+ > MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/ram1 > MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o dax /dev/ram1 /mnt/scratch > .... > generic/083 2s ... 1s > _check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/ram1 is inconsistent (c) (see /home/dave/src/xfstests-dev/results//xfs/generic/083.full) > _check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/ram1 is inconsistent (r) (see /home/dave/src/xfstests-dev/results//xfs/generic/083.full) > .... > > But as I ran earlier today when testing the ENOSPC fix: > > PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 test4 4.4.0-rc2-dgc+ > MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/ram1 > MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o dax /dev/ram1 /mnt/scratch > .... > generic/083 1s ... 2s > .... > > So I'm seeing that the current 4.4-rc2 + my local dev tree patches > appear to have fixed whatever was causing generic/083 to fail > here... Yea, interesting, the patch you sent out yesterday: xfs: Don't use reserved blocks for data blocks with DAX Makes this issue disappear in my system as well. Testing with v4.4-rc3 generic/083 fails 50% of the time or so in my setup, but with just that patch added to v4.4-rc3 I can't make it fail. > What version of xfsprogs are you using, Ross? I'm currently using xfsprogs v4.3.0, but the failure occurred when I was using v4.2.0 as well. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs