From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D072D7F50 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 15:51:21 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF958304059 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 13:51:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from ZenIV.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk [195.92.253.2]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id gPpAtHdhWJzrvCLz (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 13:51:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 21:51:09 +0000 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: v4.4-rc4 regression with direct-io Message-ID: <20151208215109.GR20997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20151208213902.GA4212@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151208213902.GA4212@linux.intel.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Ross Zwisler , Jan Kara , stable@vger.kernel.org, Steven Whitehouse , Avi Kivity , Jens Axboe , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 02:39:02PM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote: > Hey Jan, > > In my test setup this commit: > > 74cedf9b6c60 ("direct-io: Fix negative return from dio read beyond eof") > > causes a regression with XFS and the test generic/113. The test used to > pass, but with the above mentioned commit it just hangs indefinitely. > > This commit went in between v4.4-rc3 and v4.4-rc4, and it looks like it was > marked for stable? See the tip of vfs.git#for-linus for fix... _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs