From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D433B7F51 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 10:34:53 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B24BB30404E for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 08:34:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 9O34LbqvXNDhZoHa (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 08:34:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 08:34:49 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] reflink: more tests Message-ID: <20151210163449.GA15774@infradead.org> References: <20151208062844.21871.23644.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <20151208062904.21871.30589.stgit@birch.djwong.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151208062904.21871.30589.stgit@birch.djwong.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, hch@infradead.org, tao.peng@primarydata.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org The new 849 fails reliably on btrfs, which makes me wonder if either the test is doing something wrong, or the btrfs whole file clone behavior is broken, which wouldn't be very reasuring. I didn't have time to look into why it's failing yet. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs