From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EA5E7F3F for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 22:26:15 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 508088F8033 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 20:26:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 9hFoCPDQpMlwpRVv for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 20:26:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 21:26:09 -0700 From: Ross Zwisler Subject: Re: xfstests failures with xfs, dax and v4.4-rc3 Message-ID: <20151211042609.GA5360@linux.intel.com> References: <20151202183438.GA1319@linux.intel.com> <20151202202910.GH19199@dastard> <20151202204502.GI19199@dastard> <20151202213932.GA7652@linux.intel.com> <20151210165458.GA13603@linux.intel.com> <20151210223333.GH26718@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151210223333.GH26718@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Brian Foster , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, Jeff Moyer , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Ross Zwisler On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 09:33:33AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 09:54:58AM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 02:39:32PM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote: > > > I've verified that this fixes all three failing xfstests reported in this mail. > > > Thanks! > > > > Hey Dave, > > > > Are you planning on pushing this fix for v4.4? > > No plans to right now - ENOSPC is a corner case that most users > won't be anywhere near, especially for experimental functionality on > hardware nobody actually has.... Really? I realize that it may be a case that most users won't actually hit, but it is a 5 line change that fixes four xfstests regressions between v4.3 and v4.4 for my DAX testing... Is there a strong reason *not* to push it in the v4.4 cycle? I'm trying to clear up all xfstests differences between DAX and non-DAX, and this would help quite a bit. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs