From: Vallo Kallaste <kalts@estpak.ee>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: State of ext4 auto_da_alloc-like workarounds in XFS
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 20:37:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151221183726.GC482@hape.internal> (raw)
Hi
The ext4 workaround for wrong-but-common truncate/rename cases can be found at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ext4#Delayed_allocation_and_potential_data_loss
This is the default "auto_da_alloc" mount option.
There is no mention of similar workaround in XFS FAQ at
http://xfs.org/index.php/XFS_FAQ nor
Wiki article at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XFS
I suggest adding such a section.
I have read the thread at
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.xfs.general/53366
There seems to be definite answer at the top of
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.xfs.general/53376
But besides that I found
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/812588 where it's mentioned that
/--/
The bigger problem from my perspective is that XFS is only doing this for the
truncate case, and (from what I've been told) not for the rename case.
/--/
I'd like to know the current state of ext4 auto_da_alloc-like workarounds in XFS,
particularly for RHEL7. Considering the two cases in
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ext4#Delayed_allocation_and_potential_data_loss
is XFS behaving the same as ext4, both mounted with default options?
thanks,
--
Vallo
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next reply other threads:[~2015-12-21 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-21 18:37 Vallo Kallaste [this message]
2015-12-21 18:48 ` State of ext4 auto_da_alloc-like workarounds in XFS Eric Sandeen
2015-12-21 19:37 ` Vallo Kallaste
2015-12-21 19:47 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151221183726.GC482@hape.internal \
--to=kalts@estpak.ee \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox