From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D03DF7F7B for ; Sun, 3 Jan 2016 07:41:56 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B4B304032 for ; Sun, 3 Jan 2016 05:41:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 4USlGAfHahtiruWm (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 03 Jan 2016 05:41:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 05:41:51 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/22] xfsdocs: document the operation of the realtime device and inodes Message-ID: <20160103134151.GB9144@infradead.org> References: <20151219091208.15558.65013.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <20151219091351.15558.51417.stgit@birch.djwong.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151219091351.15558.51417.stgit@birch.djwong.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Looks generally good, although I wonder the take on the realtime device is a bit too positive given that we generally advise people not to use it. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs