public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] repair: parallelise uncertin inode processing in phase 3
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 14:12:14 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160104191213.GE19852@bfoster.bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450733829-9319-6-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 08:37:05AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> This can take a long time when there are millions of uncertain inodes in badly
> broken filesystems. THe processing is per-ag, the data structures are all
> per-ag, and the load is mostly CPU time spent checking CRCs on each
> uncertaini inode. Parallelising reduced the runtime of this phase on a badly
> broken filesytem from ~30 minutes to under 5 miniutes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---

This one seems a bit more scary simply because the amount of work
involved in phase 3, such as inode processing and whatnot. I don't think
that everything in there is necessarily AG local as the commit log
description above implies. On a skim through, I do see that we have
ag_locks[agno].lock for cases that can cross AG boundaries, such as
checking block allocation state (get_bmap()/set_bmap()) of bmapbt blocks
(iiuc?), for example.

So I can't really spot any actual problems, but there's a lot of code
down in there. I'm fine with it as long as testing bears out and this
gets a reasonable amount of soak time such that we can hopefully catch
any serious issues or areas currently lacking sufficient locking:

Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>

>  repair/phase3.c     | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  repair/protos.h     |  2 +-
>  repair/xfs_repair.c |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/repair/phase3.c b/repair/phase3.c
> index 76c9440..0890a27 100644
> --- a/repair/phase3.c
> +++ b/repair/phase3.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
>  #include "dinode.h"
>  #include "progress.h"
>  #include "bmap.h"
> +#include "threads.h"
>  
>  static void
>  process_agi_unlinked(
> @@ -87,10 +88,33 @@ process_ags(
>  	do_inode_prefetch(mp, ag_stride, process_ag_func, false, false);
>  }
>  
> +static void
> +do_uncertain_aginodes(
> +	work_queue_t	*wq,
> +	xfs_agnumber_t	agno,
> +	void		*arg)
> +{
> +	int		*count = arg;
> +
> +	*count = process_uncertain_aginodes(wq->mp, agno);
> +
> +#ifdef XR_INODE_TRACE
> +	fprintf(stderr,
> +		"\t\t phase 3 - ag %d process_uncertain_inodes returns %d\n",
> +		*count, j);
> +#endif
> +
> +	PROG_RPT_INC(prog_rpt_done[agno], 1);
> +}
> +
>  void
> -phase3(xfs_mount_t *mp)
> +phase3(
> +	struct xfs_mount *mp,
> +	int		scan_threads)
>  {
> -	int 			i, j;
> +	int			i, j;
> +	int			*counts;
> +	work_queue_t		wq;
>  
>  	do_log(_("Phase 3 - for each AG...\n"));
>  	if (!no_modify)
> @@ -129,20 +153,35 @@ phase3(xfs_mount_t *mp)
>  	 */
>  	do_log(_("        - process newly discovered inodes...\n"));
>  	set_progress_msg(PROG_FMT_NEW_INODES, (__uint64_t) glob_agcount);
> +
> +	counts = calloc(sizeof(*counts), mp->m_sb.sb_agcount);
> +	if (!counts) {
> +		do_abort(_("no memory for uncertain inode counts\n"));
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>  	do  {
>  		/*
>  		 * have to loop until no ag has any uncertain
>  		 * inodes
>  		 */
>  		j = 0;
> -		for (i = 0; i < mp->m_sb.sb_agcount; i++)  {
> -			j += process_uncertain_aginodes(mp, i);
> -#ifdef XR_INODE_TRACE
> -			fprintf(stderr,
> -				"\t\t phase 3 - process_uncertain_inodes returns %d\n", j);
> -#endif
> -			PROG_RPT_INC(prog_rpt_done[i], 1);
> -		}
> +		memset(counts, 0, mp->m_sb.sb_agcount * sizeof(*counts));
> +
> +		create_work_queue(&wq, mp, scan_threads);
> +
> +		for (i = 0; i < mp->m_sb.sb_agcount; i++)
> +			queue_work(&wq, do_uncertain_aginodes, i, &counts[i]);
> +
> +		destroy_work_queue(&wq);
> +
> +		/* tally up the counts */
> +		for (i = 0; i < mp->m_sb.sb_agcount; i++)
> +			j += counts[i];
> +
>  	} while (j != 0);
> +
> +	free(counts);
> +
>  	print_final_rpt();
>  }
> diff --git a/repair/protos.h b/repair/protos.h
> index b113aca..0290420 100644
> --- a/repair/protos.h
> +++ b/repair/protos.h
> @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ void	thread_init(void);
>  
>  void	phase1(struct xfs_mount *);
>  void	phase2(struct xfs_mount *, int);
> -void	phase3(struct xfs_mount *);
> +void	phase3(struct xfs_mount *, int);
>  void	phase4(struct xfs_mount *);
>  void	phase5(struct xfs_mount *);
>  void	phase6(struct xfs_mount *);
> diff --git a/repair/xfs_repair.c b/repair/xfs_repair.c
> index fcdb212..5d5f3aa 100644
> --- a/repair/xfs_repair.c
> +++ b/repair/xfs_repair.c
> @@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
>  	if (do_prefetch)
>  		init_prefetch(mp);
>  
> -	phase3(mp);
> +	phase3(mp, phase2_threads);
>  	timestamp(PHASE_END, 3, NULL);
>  
>  	phase4(mp);
> -- 
> 2.5.0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-04 19:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-21 21:37 [PATCH 0/9] xfsprogs: big, broken filesystems cause pain Dave Chinner
2015-12-21 21:37 ` [PATCH 1/9] metadump: clean up btree block region zeroing Dave Chinner
2016-01-04 19:11   ` Brian Foster
2015-12-21 21:37 ` [PATCH 2/9] metadump: bounds check btree block regions being zeroed Dave Chinner
2016-01-04 19:11   ` Brian Foster
2015-12-21 21:37 ` [PATCH 3/9] xfs_mdrestore: correctly account bytes read Dave Chinner
2016-01-04 19:12   ` Brian Foster
2015-12-21 21:37 ` [PATCH 4/9] repair: parallelise phase 7 Dave Chinner
2016-01-04 19:12   ` Brian Foster
2015-12-21 21:37 ` [PATCH 5/9] repair: parallelise uncertin inode processing in phase 3 Dave Chinner
2016-01-04 19:12   ` Brian Foster [this message]
2015-12-21 21:37 ` [PATCH 6/9] libxfs: directory node splitting does not have an extra block Dave Chinner
2016-01-05 18:34   ` Brian Foster
2016-01-05 22:07     ` Dave Chinner
2015-12-21 21:37 ` [PATCH 7/9] libxfs: don't discard dirty buffers Dave Chinner
2016-01-05 18:34   ` Brian Foster
2015-12-21 21:37 ` [PATCH 8/9] libxfs: don't repeatedly shake unwritable buffers Dave Chinner
2016-01-05 18:34   ` Brian Foster
2015-12-21 21:37 ` [PATCH 9/9] libxfs: keep unflushable buffers off the cache MRUs Dave Chinner
2016-01-05 18:34   ` Brian Foster
2016-01-05 23:58     ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160104191213.GE19852@bfoster.bfoster \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox