From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A48E7F37 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:23:52 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C96304066 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 16:23:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from userp1040.oracle.com (userp1040.oracle.com [156.151.31.81]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id rpjiS8hdt9pOcHmC (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 16:23:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 16:23:18 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" Subject: Re: [RFCv4 00/22] xfs-documentation: massive cleanups and add v5 format, reverse-mapping, reflink, and dedupe support Message-ID: <20160105002318.GG28330@birch.djwong.org> References: <20151219091208.15558.65013.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <20151220152936.GA20135@infradead.org> <20151220204657.GT26718@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151220204657.GT26718@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 07:46:57AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 07:29:36AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 01:12:08AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > This patch set does the following: > > > > I'll review the actual patches once I'll get more time, but maybe it's a > > good idea to split this series and get all the cleanups and fixes in > > ASAP and only land the new reverse mapping and reflink bits once the > > code hits mainline? > > I'll be cherrying picking all the cleanups and fixes out of all the > various patch series over the next couple days, so that's in effect > what will happen... If I did it right, the rmap/reflink content should be contained within their respective patches. Let me know if you find mistakes, though. --D > > Cheers, > > Dave. > -- > Dave Chinner > david@fromorbit.com > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@oss.sgi.com > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs