From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8B5A7F53 for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 18:10:16 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A3F08F804C for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 16:10:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id dXeCJn5O8YPiDa2Z (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 16:10:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 16:09:39 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" Subject: Re: [PATCH 34/76] xfs: implement XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT when rmap btree is enabled Message-ID: <20160107000939.GA8015@birch.djwong.org> References: <20151219085622.12713.88678.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <20151219090008.12713.25755.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <20160103121728.GC28429@infradead.org> <20160104234033.GD28330@birch.djwong.org> <20160105024130.GI19802@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160105024130.GI19802@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 01:41:30PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 03:40:33PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 04:17:28AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 01:00:08AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > > Implement extent swapping when reverse-mapping is enabled. > > > > > > Can you just fold this into the previous patch? There seem to be a lot > > > of patches in the series that would benefit from merging, but this > > > is the one that really screams for it :) > > > > The only reason I'm keeping Dave's original rmap patches separate is because > > the last time I checked with Dave, he said that he'd made a few bugfixes to his > > patchset that hadn't yet been sent out, so I'd like to merge those fixes into > > the original patches before starting any combining work. > > I haven't had a chance to sort any of those out fully, so it's > probably best if you combine all your patches to minimise the > separation and I'll send delta patches (if still relevant) as I work > through it all in the next couple of weeks... Ok, I'll start combining them as I remove all the kerneldoc comments. I think I've gotten all the "CoW reservations left over at unmount" bugs out, so I'll probably have a slimmer patchset in a week or two. (Or everything will go nuts on some weird arch like arm64 and kablooie...) --D > > Cheers, > > Dave. > -- > Dave Chinner > david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs