public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] xfs: shrink the struct xfs_icdinode
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 08:05:17 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160112210517.GK10456@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160112153010.GA29662@infradead.org>

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 07:30:10AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Nice!
> 
> I had started on some of this a while ago but never finished it..

*nod*

> > 72 bytes. This means it takes 104 bytes off the size of the struct
> > xfs_inode, which a 12% reduction in size. This will be a massive win
> > for systems that cache lots of inodes!
> 
> How many more inodes can we fit into a slab cache now?  Back when I
> started I noticed it doesn't help us to actually fit more inodes into
> a 4k page due to the bloated VFS inode.  But these days slub actually
> uses a high order allocations if I remember correctly so it might be
> more useful.

On a debug build (because that's the only numbers I have at hand),
the current code is 1280 bytes/inode, 25 inodes/slab, 8 pages/slab.
This patch set makes it 1152 bytes/inode, 28 inodes/slab, 8
pages/slab, so that's a 12% increase in the number of cached inodes
for a given amount of slab memory.

IIRC, a production build is around 960 bytes/inode, so that would
put it at 34 inodes/slab for the current code and 38 inodes/slab
for the current patchset. That, again, is roughly 12% increase in
inodes per slab....

> > With this change made, the xfs_icdinode is no long an "in core disk
> > inode" so I'm wondering whether I should rename it or simply make it
> > go away altogether and pull the remaining fields straight into the
> > struct xfs_inode. Any thoughts on new names and/or getting rid of it
> > woul dbe appreciated.
> 
> I think it should be merged into the xfs_inode structure soner or
> later.

Ok, I'll look at doing that.

> Another thign I planned but never got to is to move fields
> into the inode fork that were specific to the attr or data fork.

That's a whole different problem ;)

Cheers,

Dave.


-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

      reply	other threads:[~2016-01-12 21:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-12  9:01 [RFC PATCH 0/8] xfs: shrink the struct xfs_icdinode Dave Chinner
2016-01-12  9:01 ` [PATCH 1/8] xfs: introduce inode log format object Dave Chinner
2016-01-12  9:01 ` [PATCH 2/8] xfs: remove timestamps from incore inode Dave Chinner
2016-01-12  9:01 ` [PATCH 3/8] xfs; cull unnecessary icdinode fields Dave Chinner
2016-01-12  9:01 ` [PATCH 4/8] xfs: move v1 inode conversion to xfs_inode_from_disk Dave Chinner
2016-01-12  9:01 ` [PATCH 5/8] xfs: use vfs inode nlink field everywhere Dave Chinner
2016-01-12  9:01 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfs: move inode generation count to VFS inode Dave Chinner
2016-01-12  9:01 ` [PATCH 7/8] xfs: move di_changecount " Dave Chinner
2016-01-12  9:01 ` [PATCH 8/8] xfs: mode di_mode to vfs inode Dave Chinner
2016-01-12 15:30 ` [RFC PATCH 0/8] xfs: shrink the struct xfs_icdinode Christoph Hellwig
2016-01-12 21:05   ` Dave Chinner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160112210517.GK10456@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox