From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFFE07F37 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:52:11 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DD00AC004 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 12:52:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from userp1040.oracle.com (userp1040.oracle.com [156.151.31.81]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 6jpQFCVF9vjM37gm (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 12:52:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 12:52:04 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" Subject: Re: a reflink fix Message-ID: <20160113205204.GA5892@birch.djwong.org> References: <1452701629-11537-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1452701629-11537-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 05:13:48PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > This fixes the issues I saw with generic/168 over NFS. Turns out it > wasn't anything specific to that particular test cases, we just needed > a sufficiently aged refcount btree to trigger it. Thanks for the patch; I've worked the fixes into the overall patchset. I also wrote a quick reproducer which will appear as xfs/807 in my next xfstests drop. --D _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs