From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E437F50 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 04:17:36 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D85C58F8059 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 02:17:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id VdpzQ6dy4LRycVlM (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 02:17:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 02:17:29 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] Add configure check for members of dirent for use in io/readdir.c Message-ID: <20160114101729.GC27644@infradead.org> References: <20160112200022.GG568@nyan> <20160113075855.GG21939@infradead.org> <20160113170938.GA10942@nyan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160113170938.GA10942@nyan> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Felix Janda Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 06:09:38PM +0100, Felix Janda wrote: > Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > I think we're having a deeper issue here. For an LFS build we > > absolutely should have these values as the kernel dirent64 has them. > > > > Either we manage to not pull in the LFS version of readdir/getdents > > or musl is doing something inredibly stupid. Can you investigate if > > and why we're not using the LFS getdents64 here? > > With musl you always have LFS. However still musl does not define the > _DIRENT_HAVE_*. You can see the full dirent.h at: > > http://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/include/dirent.h > > I will ask on the musl list whether these constants can be added. So > you can disregard this patch. Oh, ok. That's a little weird, but I guess working around that with a new autoconf test is fine. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs