From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 853087F47 for ; Sat, 16 Jan 2016 15:22:41 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A2CDAC001 for ; Sat, 16 Jan 2016 13:22:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from imap.thunk.org (imap.thunk.org [74.207.234.97]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id GgO93F2ARYu7k6YL (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 16 Jan 2016 13:22:33 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 16:22:31 -0500 From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: use FS_XFLAG definitions directly Message-ID: <20160116212231.GB26427@thunk.org> References: <1451886892-15548-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1451886892-15548-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1451886892-15548-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, ext4@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 04:54:51PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner > > Now that the ioctls have been hoisted up to the VFS level, use > the VFs definitions directly and remove the XFS specific definitions > completely. Userspace is going to have to handle the change of this > interface separately, so removing the definitions from xfs_fs.h is > not an issue here at all. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner Looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o - Ted _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs