From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: jkosina@suse.cz, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Hendrik Woltersdorf <hendrikw@arcor.de>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "xfs: clear PF_NOFREEZE for xfsaild kthread"
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 11:21:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160121102129.GD29520@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160120211944.GE20456@dastard>
[CCing Rafael - the thread starts here
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1452661968-11482-1-git-send-email-david%40fromorbit.com]
On Thu 21-01-16 08:19:44, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 09:47:50AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 13-01-16 16:12:48, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > This reverts commit 24ba16bb3d499c49974669cd8429c3e4138ab102 as it
> > > prevents machines from suspending. This regression occurs when the
> > > xfsaild is idle on entry to suspend, and so there s no activity to
> > > wake it from it's idle sleep and hence see that it is supposed to
> > > freeze. Hence the freezer times out waiting for it and suspend is
> > > cancelled.
> > >
> > > There is no obvious fix for this short of freezing the filesystem
> > > properly, so revert this change for now.
> >
> > We had a similar report opensuse bugzilla just recently. I believe the
> > proper fix should be the following:
> ....
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c
> > index aa67339b9537..d6c9c3e9e02b 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c
> > @@ -520,14 +520,14 @@ xfsaild(
> > if (!xfs_ail_min(ailp) &&
> > ailp->xa_target == ailp->xa_target_prev) {
> > spin_unlock(&ailp->xa_lock);
> > - schedule();
> > + freezable_schedule();
>
> Oh, wonderful. A completely separate set of undocumented schedule
> functions defined inside the freezer header files that are needed
> just for freezable kthreads.
Yeah, I am not really happy about them either.
> Perhaps there should be some documentation somewhere on how to write
> suspend safe kthreads?
There is something in Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt but
freezable_schedule* is not mentioned there. Prhaps something like the
following would make it more clear?
diff --git a/Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt b/Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt
index 85894d83b352..4df53f0c05a6 100644
--- a/Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt
+++ b/Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt
@@ -56,8 +56,11 @@ calling try_to_freeze(). The main loop of a freezable kernel thread may look
If a freezable kernel thread fails to call try_to_freeze() after the freezer has
initiated a freezing operation, the freezing of tasks will fail and the entire
hibernation operation will be cancelled. For this reason, freezable kernel
-threads must call try_to_freeze() somewhere or use one of the
-wait_event_freezable() and wait_event_freezable_timeout() macros.
+threads must call try_to_freeze() somewhere, use wait_event_freezable*()
+and wait_event_freezable_timeout() macros or use freezable_schedule* to hide
+the kernel thread from the suspend if it is guaranteed that a later wake up
+cannot interact with the suspend process (e.g. there is a try_to_freeze call
+or no IO is submitted or any of the suspended devices is not accessed etc..)
After the system memory state has been restored from a hibernation image and
devices have been reinitialized, the function thaw_processes() is called in
> This is too late for the current merge window, but I'll queue it up
> for the next one so we can get some testing on it first.
Sure, no problem and thanks!
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-21 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-13 5:12 [PATCH] Revert "xfs: clear PF_NOFREEZE for xfsaild kthread" Dave Chinner
2016-01-13 8:37 ` Jiri Kosina
2016-01-13 13:22 ` Brian Foster
2016-01-20 8:47 ` Michal Hocko
2016-01-20 21:19 ` Dave Chinner
2016-01-21 10:21 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2016-01-21 22:24 ` Dave Chinner
2016-01-22 9:52 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160121102129.GD29520@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hendrikw@arcor.de \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox