From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AE777CA2 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 07:03:07 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB86304067 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 05:03:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id yiKdJuaWx0tPj11S (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 05:03:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 14:02:58 +0100 From: Carlos Maiolino Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] xfsprogs: minor quota fixups Message-ID: <20160128130258.GB16237@redhat.com> References: <56A9497C.9070400@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56A9497C.9070400@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Makes sense to me, consider it Reviewed-by: Carlos Maiolino On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 04:49:32PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Small fixups encountered while digging through quota... > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@oss.sgi.com > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs -- Carlos _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs