From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E3FD7CA2 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 07:16:19 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E207D304067 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 05:16:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id c3D8xFk5w4SniLUF (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 05:16:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 05:16:14 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: RFCv4+ WIP rollup of XFS reverse-mapping, reflink, and dedupe support Message-ID: <20160128131614.GA14876@infradead.org> References: <20160123013130.GC5496@birch.djwong.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160123013130.GC5496@birch.djwong.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Do you have a bisectable version of the updates? I'm running into hangs with generic/154 with the new code over NFS, due what might be a missing ilock unlock, but so far I can't make sense of it. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs