From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E94227CA2 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 14:37:55 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD5530405F for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 12:37:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id YBHuc27u2g7LEhXb (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 12:37:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 12:37:40 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" Subject: Re: xfstests xfs/293 failure with current xfstests Message-ID: <20160129203740.GG20038@birch.djwong.org> References: <20160129192145.GC5224@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160129192145.GC5224@linux.intel.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Ross Zwisler Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:21:45PM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote: > It looks like the current version of xfsprogs (v4.3.0) has an inconsistency > between its documentation and implementation that is making the xfstest > xfs/293 fail: > > ./check xfs/293 > FSTYP -- xfs (debug) > PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 lorwyn 4.5.0-rc1 > MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/pmem0p2 > MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o dax -o context=system_u:object_r:nfs_t:s0 /dev/pmem0p2 /mnt/xfstests_scratch > > xfs/293 - output mismatch (see /root/xfstests/results//xfs/293.out.bad) > --- tests/xfs/293.out 2015-10-02 10:19:36.836796097 -0600 > +++ /root/xfstests/results//xfs/293.out.bad 2016-01-29 10:41:25.530512911 -0700 > @@ -1,2 +1,4 @@ > QA output created by 293 > Silence is golden > +help not documented in the xfs_io manpage > +zero not documented in the xfs_io manpage > ... > (Run 'diff -u tests/xfs/293.out /root/xfstests/results//xfs/293.out.bad' to see the entire diff) > Ran: xfs/293 > Failures: xfs/293 > Failed 1 of 1 tests > > "help" and "zero" are indeed options in xfs_io, but aren't listed in the man > page. Commit 270dae6c0b41d855729fec73f94f33665bd36349 in xfsprogs for-next fixes this. --D > > Thanks, > - Ross > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@oss.sgi.com > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs