From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] xfs: introduce inode log format object
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 06:28:23 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160208192823.GE27429@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160208092318.GA28146@infradead.org>
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:23:18AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> This looks fine in general:
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>
> But: this now introduce struct inode to libxfs code, what's your plan
> to deal with that in xfsprogs?
The struct xfs_inode is already unique between user and kernel
space, so I was simply going to define all the new fields directly
inside the struct xfs_inode and:
#define VFS_I(ip) (ip)
Or If I can't get that to work without somehow defining a struct
inode, then put all the fields in a struct inode private to the
struct xfs_inode and just do the same conversion as the kernel.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-08 19:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-08 4:24 [PATCH v3 0/9] xfs: gut the struct xfs_icdinode Dave Chinner
2016-02-08 4:24 ` [PATCH 1/9] xfs: introduce inode log format object Dave Chinner
2016-02-08 9:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-08 19:28 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2016-02-08 4:24 ` [PATCH 2/9] xfs: remove timestamps from incore inode Dave Chinner
2016-02-08 9:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-08 4:24 ` [PATCH 3/9] xfs: cull unnecessary icdinode fields Dave Chinner
2016-02-08 9:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-08 15:29 ` Brian Foster
2016-02-08 4:24 ` [PATCH 4/9] xfs: move v1 inode conversion to xfs_inode_from_disk Dave Chinner
2016-02-08 9:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-08 19:44 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-08 4:24 ` [PATCH 5/9] xfs: reinitialise recycled VFS inode correctly Dave Chinner
2016-02-08 9:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-08 15:29 ` Brian Foster
2016-02-08 4:24 ` [PATCH 6/9] xfs: use vfs inode nlink field everywhere Dave Chinner
2016-02-08 9:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-08 19:47 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-08 15:29 ` Brian Foster
2016-02-08 4:24 ` [PATCH 7/9] xfs: move inode generation count to VFS inode Dave Chinner
2016-02-08 9:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-08 15:29 ` Brian Foster
2016-02-08 4:24 ` [PATCH 8/9] xfs: move di_changecount " Dave Chinner
2016-02-08 9:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-08 4:24 ` [PATCH 9/9] xfs: mode di_mode to vfs inode Dave Chinner
2016-02-08 9:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-08 19:50 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-08 15:29 ` Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160208192823.GE27429@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox