From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] xfs: Introduce writeback context for writepages
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 05:39:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160209133941.GA13357@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454910258-7578-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
This looks good in general and now passes testing for me. A couple
comments below:
>
> /*
> - * Cancel submission of all buffer_heads so far in this endio.
> - * Toss the endio too. Only ever called for the initial page
> - * in a writepage request, so only ever one page.
> - */
> -STATIC void
> -xfs_cancel_ioend(
> - xfs_ioend_t *ioend)
> -{
> - xfs_ioend_t *next;
> - struct buffer_head *bh, *next_bh;
> -
> - do {
> - next = ioend->io_list;
> - bh = ioend->io_buffer_head;
> - do {
> - next_bh = bh->b_private;
> - clear_buffer_async_write(bh);
> - /*
> - * The unwritten flag is cleared when added to the
> - * ioend. We're not submitting for I/O so mark the
> - * buffer unwritten again for next time around.
> - */
> - if (ioend->io_type == XFS_IO_UNWRITTEN)
> - set_buffer_unwritten(bh);
> - unlock_buffer(bh);
> - } while ((bh = next_bh) != NULL);
> -
> - mempool_free(ioend, xfs_ioend_pool);
> - } while ((ioend = next) != NULL);
> -}
Removing xfs_cancel_ioend and replacing it with the start and cancel
writeback scheme that we currently only use for
xfs_setfilesize_trans_alloc failures actually seems to be the biggest
change in this patch and is entirely undocumented. Any chance you
could split this into a prep patch and properly document it?
> -
> - if (!ioend || need_ioend || type != ioend->io_type) {
> - xfs_ioend_t *previous = *result;
> -
> - ioend = xfs_alloc_ioend(inode, type);
> - ioend->io_offset = offset;
> - ioend->io_buffer_head = bh;
> - ioend->io_buffer_tail = bh;
> - if (previous)
> - previous->io_list = ioend;
> - *result = ioend;
> + if (!wpc->ioend || wpc->io_type != wpc->ioend->io_type ||
> + bh->b_blocknr != wpc->last_block + 1) {
We now start a new ioend if the blocks aren't contiguous, which seems
reasonable. But this also means the similar check in xfs_submit_ioend
should be removed at the same time.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-09 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-08 5:44 [PATCH 0/5 v3] xfs: get rid of xfs_cluster_write() Dave Chinner
2016-02-08 5:44 ` [PATCH 1/5] xfs: remove nonblocking mode from xfs_vm_writepage Dave Chinner
2016-02-08 5:44 ` [PATCH 2/5] xfs: Introduce writeback context for writepages Dave Chinner
2016-02-09 13:39 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2016-02-09 21:48 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-09 23:16 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-09 14:22 ` Brian Foster
2016-02-09 21:51 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-08 5:44 ` [PATCH 3/5] xfs: xfs_cluster_write is redundant Dave Chinner
2016-02-09 13:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-08 5:44 ` [PATCH 4/5] xfs: factor mapping out of xfs_do_writepage Dave Chinner
2016-02-09 13:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-08 5:44 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: don't chain ioends during writepage submission Dave Chinner
2016-02-09 13:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-09 21:52 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-09 14:23 ` Brian Foster
2016-02-09 21:59 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-10 13:18 ` Brian Foster
2016-02-10 21:09 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-11 12:24 ` Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160209133941.GA13357@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox