public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfsprogs: guard fsxattr definition for newer kernels
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 06:55:02 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160209195502.GR27429@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56BA24A9.4090403@redhat.com>

On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 11:40:57AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> After 334e580,
> fs: XFS_IOC_FS[SG]SETXATTR to FS_IOC_FS[SG]ETXATTR promotion
> 
> the file include/linux/fs.h now defines struct fsxattr.
> 
> It defines FS_IOC_FSGETXATTR as well, so use that to wrap
> our local definition, and skip it if the kernel is providing
> it so that we don't get multiple definitions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
> ---
> 
> Should the kernel also #define HAVE_FSXATTR to help existing
> xfsprogs-devel installations?
> 
> (And what if headers are included in the other order?  Should
> we try to guard on the kernel side or no?)

I've already sent a patch to fix this - it was with the foreign
filesystem xfs_quota patch....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-09 19:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-09 17:40 [PATCH] xfsprogs: guard fsxattr definition for newer kernels Eric Sandeen
2016-02-09 19:55 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2016-02-09 19:57   ` Eric Sandeen
2016-02-09 21:10     ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-09 21:27       ` Eric Sandeen
2016-02-09 21:44         ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-09 21:45           ` Eric Sandeen
2016-02-09 22:37             ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160209195502.GR27429@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox