From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B99AF7CBC for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 15:45:12 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 422F1AC006 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 13:45:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.129]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id mD5OlwsfYFHdWXS5 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 13:45:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 08:44:52 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: xfs_nondir_ilock_class lockdep warning Message-ID: <20160210214452.GO14668@dastard> References: <201602101953.HEB13075.HFLOOFQVStOJFM@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201602101953.HEB13075.HFLOOFQVStOJFM@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Tetsuo Handa Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 07:53:21PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > Hello. > > I'm getting xfs_nondir_ilock_class lockdep warning. > I reported this because google hits little. > Please reply if this is not a known false positive. False positive. The XFS inode memory reclaim code will never try to reclaim (and hence lock) an inode with an active reference. Hence no deadlock is possible. -Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs