From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8004E7CA5 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 13:47:54 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7AD6AC007 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 11:47:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Z04C53E2oJMYp2dz (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 11:47:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 13:47:49 -0600 From: "Bill O'Donnell" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] libxcmd: generalize topology functions Message-ID: <20160212194749.GA10069@redhat.com> References: <1455303811-9874-1-git-send-email-billodo@redhat.com> <1455303811-9874-2-git-send-email-billodo@redhat.com> <20160212193942.GA4770@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160212193942.GA4770@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:39:42AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 01:03:30PM -0600, Bill O'Donnell wrote: > > Move general topology functions from xfs_mkfs to new topology > > collection in libxcmd. > > Why libxcmd and not libxfs? We discussed that a bit. Since libxfs has the kernel support code, and not generally the xfsprogs library, I put it in libxcmd. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs