From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CDAB7CA3 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 13:20:02 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FCC78F8049 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:20:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id zUlOQd2c2a1VyiFu (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:19:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 14:19:56 -0500 From: Brian Foster Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/14] xfsprogs: kernel libxfs sync up to 4.5-rc2 Message-ID: <20160216191955.GE39655@bfoster.bfoster> References: <1455517105-20033-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1455517105-20033-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 05:18:11PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > Hi folks, > > This patchset pulls xfsprogs lixfs up to the same base code as the > v4.5-rc2 kernel. I've simply pulled the commits across and in each > patch made the external xfsprogs changes necessary to make them > compile and work correctly. This applies on top of the xfs_io dax > patchset I posted a short while ago. I've left all the kernel > sign-offs on the commits - it's really only the patches that change > stuff outside libxfs that need any sort of review... > > This is pretty much all of the remaining changes needed before I can > cut a 4.5.0-rc1 release of xfsprogs - it's really only bug fixes and > minor changes from here, as I really need this base tree mostly > stable from here on. > > The reason for that I'm now going to be build a for-next branch off > this that has all the changes in the current kernel for-next branch. > This will enable Darrick to have a sane code base that he can rebase > all his xfsprogs changes for rmap/reflink on top of. That will make > review, testing and eventual merge much easier for everyone. > A couple nits to follow that don't warrant a resend. So, for the series: Reviewed-by: Brian Foster > -Dave. > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@oss.sgi.com > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs