From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384307CA9 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 01:56:17 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C478F8035 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 23:56:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 3BXi5AIX9BUVUEBG (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 23:56:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 23:56:14 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] xfsprogs: libxfs kernel sync to 4.6-for-next Message-ID: <20160217075614.GA11432@infradead.org> References: <1455693652-3899-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1455693652-3899-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com The series looks fine modulo the nitpicks I posted. But shouldn't the rtinode fixes go into 4.5 as clear bugfixes? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs