From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F31A7CA5 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 02:16:33 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E0B78F8033 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:16:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.143]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 0B3siVogslLipAAq for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:16:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:16:17 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] xfsprogs: libxfs kernel sync to 4.6-for-next Message-ID: <20160217081617.GF19486@dastard> References: <1455693652-3899-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20160217075614.GA11432@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160217075614.GA11432@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:56:14PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > The series looks fine modulo the nitpicks I posted. > > But shouldn't the rtinode fixes go into 4.5 as clear bugfixes? None of the changes in those two patches actually affect userspace. These first is a log recovery fix, and the second was to silence a warning in kernel IO submission which doesn't exist in userspace. So apart from syncing up the code, AFAICT there isn't a compelling reason to pull them back into 4.5. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs