From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C33577CA4 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 02:57:12 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 557F1AC005 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:57:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id eTxDyiySjZ3Didow (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:57:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:57:09 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: remove xfs_trans_get_block_res Message-ID: <20160217085709.GA9492@infradead.org> References: <1455699159-20906-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1455699159-20906-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Sorry - seems like I sent without the cover letter. Rational: the xfs_trans_alloc + xfs_trans_reserve combination is super confusing, and when recently debugging the block reservation issues in the reflink code I got reminded of my old series to sort this out, so I dusted it off, tested it and here were are. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs