From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D39D7CA2 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 03:56:55 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C25AC001 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 01:56:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id UjXf3CdVkkheAAcH (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 01:56:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 01:56:46 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] generic/304: fix high offset Message-ID: <20160217095646.GA21482@infradead.org> References: <20160215204608.7977.2802.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <20160215204614.7977.2848.stgit@birch.djwong.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160215204614.7977.2848.stgit@birch.djwong.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 12:46:14PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > "Invalid argument" is a better response to an impossibly high offset > dedupe request than "extents don't match", so change the test. What does btrfs return here? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs