From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC0A97CA2 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 04:10:20 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C110304053 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 02:10:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id YIKTv2Aak5EFBZ7C (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 02:10:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 02:10:12 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] generic/304: fix high offset Message-ID: <20160217101012.GA15314@infradead.org> References: <20160215204608.7977.2802.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <20160215204614.7977.2848.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <20160217095646.GA21482@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Filipe Manana Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" , fstests@vger.kernel.org, "xfs@oss.sgi.com" , Christoph Hellwig , "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:04:23AM +0000, Filipe Manana wrote: > > What does btrfs return here? > > -EINVAL, so this makes the test pass on btrfs. Ok, looks fine to me then: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs