public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: better xfs_trans_alloc interface
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:39:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160222133943.GA26966@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160217220436.GI19486@dastard>

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 09:04:36AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> I've considered doing this removal myself in the past - doing
> somethign like embedding the return address of the
> xfs-trans_reserve() call in the ticket that is allocated tells us
> exactly where the call was made. This can be printed with %pS, and
> that gives us the function (and location in the function) the
> reservation was made. Hence we solve the problem of not
> knowing which call path triggered the problem.
> 
> Hence I don't think we actually need to the type in every function
> call.

This brings up a question:  do we care about the type of the transaction,
or the caller?  The existing types were rather confused about that.
If it's the transaction type we could simply add a name field to
struct xfs_trans_res, if we care about caller the trick from Dave
should do the job.

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
---end quoted text---

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-02-22 13:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-17  8:52 [PATCH 1/3] xfs: remove xfs_trans_get_block_res Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-17  8:52 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: better xfs_trans_alloc interface Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-17 13:40   ` Brian Foster
2016-02-17 22:04     ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-18 12:10       ` Brian Foster
2016-02-22 13:39       ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2016-02-22 21:14         ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-17  8:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: remove transaction types Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-17  8:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: remove xfs_trans_get_block_res Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160222133943.GA26966@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox