From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77EFE7CBB for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 12:22:39 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E210BAC001 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 10:22:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 08xFzfVuLzN0ABu5 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 10:22:33 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 10:22:27 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: remove impossible condition Message-ID: <20160301182227.GA21238@infradead.org> References: <1456404237-18169-1-git-send-email-luisbg@osg.samsung.com> <20160301120814.GA5217@infradead.org> <56D597D5.3040002@osg.samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56D597D5.3040002@osg.samsung.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Luis de Bethencourt Cc: cmaiolino@redhat.com, darrick.wong@oracle.com, namjae.jeon@samsung.com, bfoster@redhat.com, sandeen@sandeen.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, Christoph Hellwig , billodo@redhat.com On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 01:23:33PM +0000, Luis de Bethencourt wrote: > If you have some specific things in mind that I could fix in the code around > this, I am happy to add it to my ToDo list. Or I can continue reading it and > let you know of anything I see, so you can confirm before I try to fix it. I don't think this mess is something I want to let newbies loose on :) Thanks a lot for the patch again! _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs