From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E1C17CBB for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 15:42:27 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82AA4AC001 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 13:42:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.145]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id PmBUFP448MWwcAKF for ; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 13:42:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 08:42:22 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: futher writeback updates Message-ID: <20160301214222.GK30721@dastard> References: <1456302011-18915-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20160301130113.GA3901@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160301130113.GA3901@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 05:01:13AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Any comments? I pulled them in to my testing stack yesterday afternoon. There's a good chance I'll end up delaying commiting these to the next merge window, simply because I don't have the bandwidth at this point to process any more significant changes to the for-next tree. I think it's much more important right now to get the rmap/reflink in the the 4.6 merge window than these writeback changes. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs