From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA17B7CBB for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 03:46:02 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1795EAC004 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 01:46:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 9hXNbEPy8JoAow9Q (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 01:46:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 01:45:59 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfs; for-next branch updated to 31bb236 Message-ID: <20160302094559.GB18130@infradead.org> References: <20160301231511.GM30721@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160301231511.GM30721@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com > Mateusz Guzik (1): > [2e83b79] xfs: fix two memory leaks in xfs_attr_list.c error paths This didn't seem to address the comment about using a goto for error handling? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs