From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3437D7CA0 for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2016 12:25:18 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDD58304039 for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2016 10:25:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id KDXoNEzffd2K4CyO (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 05 Mar 2016 10:25:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2016 10:25:08 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] block: test fallocate for block devices Message-ID: <20160305182508.GA25528@infradead.org> References: <20160305003717.28738.98818.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <20160305003837.28738.49794.stgit@birch.djwong.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160305003837.28738.49794.stgit@birch.djwong.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com I'm not sure xfstests is the right fit, as it does not test a file system, but rather block devices. If people think it should go into xfstests we should at least not add it to the default group, but just to a new bdev group. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs