public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Bill O'Donnell" <billodo@redhat.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: disallow rw remount on fs with unknown ro-compat features
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 15:40:35 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160329204035.GA7633@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56FAD75C.80502@redhat.com>

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 02:28:28PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Today, a kernel which refuses to mount a filesystem read-write
> due to unknown ro-compat features can still transition to read-write
> via the remount path.  The old kernel is most likely none the wiser,
> because it's unaware of the new feature, and isn't using it.  However,
> writing to the filesystem may well corrupt metadata related to that
> new feature, and moving to a newer kernel which understand the feature
> will have problems.
> 
> Right now the only ro-compat feature we have is the free inode btree,
> which showed up in v3.16.  It would be good to push this back to
> all the active stable kernels, I think, so that if anyone is using
> newer mkfs (which enables the finobt feature) with older kernel
> releases, they'll be protected.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> ---

Reviewed-by: Bill O'Donnell <billodo@redhat.com>

> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> index d760934..ca058a1 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> @@ -1276,6 +1276,16 @@ xfs_fs_remount(
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  		}
>  
> +		if (XFS_SB_VERSION_NUM(sbp) == XFS_SB_VERSION_5 &&
> +		    xfs_sb_has_ro_compat_feature(sbp,
> +					XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_UNKNOWN)) {
> +			xfs_warn(mp,
> +"ro->rw transition prohibited on unknown (0x%x) ro-compat filesystem",
> +				(sbp->sb_features_ro_compat &
> +					XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_UNKNOWN));
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +
>  		mp->m_flags &= ~XFS_MOUNT_RDONLY;
>  
>  		/*
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-29 20:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-29 19:28 [PATCH] xfs: disallow rw remount on fs with unknown ro-compat features Eric Sandeen
2016-03-29 20:40 ` Bill O'Donnell [this message]
2016-03-30  0:16 ` Dave Chinner
2016-03-30  0:27   ` Eric Sandeen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160329204035.GA7633@redhat.com \
    --to=billodo@redhat.com \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox