From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com>
Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29])
	by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 876DE7CA0
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Thu,  7 Apr 2016 10:35:18 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15])
	by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D9C30405F
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Thu,  7 Apr 2016 08:35:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with
	ESMTP id tkrt4Zs46kBEjl15 (version=TLSv1.2
	cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for
	<xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 08:35:05 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 08:35:04 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] xfs: reduce lock hold times in buffer writeback
Message-ID: <20160407153503.GA2473@infradead.org>
References: <1459836310-12619-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
	<1459836310-12619-5-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1459836310-12619-5-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI <xfs.oss.sgi.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/options/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs>
List-Post: <mailto:xfs@oss.sgi.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com

Looks fine, but is the rename of __xfs_buf_delwri_submit really useful?

Otherwise:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs