From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>, fstests@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs/259: handle minimum block size more precisely
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 16:48:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160407234837.GA1439@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160407213231.GD761@dastard>
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 07:32:31AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > diff --git a/tests/xfs/259 b/tests/xfs/259
> > index 16c1935..3150ff3 100755
> > --- a/tests/xfs/259
> > +++ b/tests/xfs/259
> > @@ -51,9 +51,7 @@ testfile=$TEST_DIR/259.image
> > # Test various sizes slightly less than 4 TB. Need to handle different
> > # minimum block sizes for CRC enabled filesystems, but use a small log so we
> > # don't write lots of zeros unnecessarily.
> > -xfs_info $TEST_DIR | _filter_mkfs 2> $tmp.mkfs > /dev/null
> > -. $tmp.mkfs
>
> This tests the configuration of the test device, which is not
> controlled by the test harness, so can be different to the
> configuration being used for the scratch device.
>
> > -if [ $_fs_has_crcs -eq 1 ]; then
> > +if [ $XFS_MKFS_CRC_DEFAULT -eq 1 ]; then
>
> IOWs, this is not an not equivalent test.
And I think that's the whole point of this change :)
Previously it tested what the TEST_DIR did, which was wrong for this
test. Now it tests what mkfs does by default (including for the scratch
dev), which is what we really want here.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-07 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-07 11:05 [PATCH] xfs/259: handle minimum block size more precisely Eryu Guan
2016-04-07 15:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-07 21:32 ` Dave Chinner
2016-04-07 23:48 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2016-04-11 0:02 ` Dave Chinner
2016-04-11 3:12 ` Eryu Guan
2016-04-11 11:38 ` Eryu Guan
2016-04-12 21:01 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160407234837.GA1439@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=eguan@redhat.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox