From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D13257CA0 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:31:14 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48703AC002 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 11:31:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id TXLiO1EDvlfmb2d2 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 11:31:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 11:31:05 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: PAGE_CACHE_* removal in 4.6-rc3 Message-ID: <20160412183105.GA10567@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: david@fromorbit.com Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Hi Dave, upstream removed the PAGE_CACHE_* macros in 4.6-rc3, which will cause all kinds of interesting conflicts for FS work. Maybe it's a good idea to rebase for-next ontop of -rc3 so that we can sort this out early? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs