From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B137CA1 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 16:11:57 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EF0EAC01D for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 14:11:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.141]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id xG4K17PNDGRqD2yE for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 14:11:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 07:11:48 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] xfs: xfs_inode_free() isn't RCU safe Message-ID: <20160412211148.GJ567@dastard> References: <0A92B65A3BF94F60BB36EA3FA716DF1F@alyakaslap> <570CDC0B.3070802@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <570CDC0B.3070802@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Brent Bice Cc: Shyam Kaushik , Alex Lyakas , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 05:29:15AM -0600, Brent Bice wrote: > Could you resend it to be sure? I flagged it for redelivery the > day I emailed you so if nobody else has seen it yet then something > still didn't work. I was pretty sure I'd seen it get delivered ok > to oss, but... (shrug) No, it didn't, and it's not in the archives, either. It seems that sgi.com is rejecting quite a bit of legitimate mail lately. I've seen a couple of people in the past couple of weeks send stuff that has reached my private in boxes but not the list. Now this one, too. If someone is having to micro-manage the list to prevent rejections of valid email then that is bad... -Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs